Discussion of Private Matters

What protection does an author have against a researcher’s interpretation of their books in light of events related to their private life?

A literary studies dissertation examines the most well-known trilogy of a famous contemporary author. The researcher interprets her books partly in light of the author’s widely publicised divorce, some rather embarrassing public appearances, and drug use that the media has been aware of but has not reported on.

The dissertation is the first time the drug use is presented publicly, which leads to the research being picked up and covered by the press. The author reacts strongly to this revelation and to the fact that her books are being interpreted in this way.

The researcher is puzzled that this is considered new information, as the influence of William S. Burroughs on the author’s work and the references to David Bowie’s Berlin period make such an interpretation quite obvious to all her readers. She further responds that the analysis is far more complex than what is portrayed in the media, and argues that the author should familiarise herself with the research before criticising it.

The researcher and the author had no contact prior to the media coverage.

Questions for discussion:

• What kind of protection does the author have against the type of portrayal she is reacting to?
• Should the researcher have obtained informed consent from the author?