Sciencists’ Background and Self-Reported Questionable Research Practices. An Exploratory Analysis.

Poster at WCRI 2022, reference list

Becher, Tony (1999) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Discipline.

Bouter, L. M., Tijdink, J., Axelsen, N., Martinson, B. C., & Ter Riet, G. (2016). Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: Results from a survey among participants of four world conferences on research integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 1, 17.

Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE.

Gopalakrishna, G., ter Riet, G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J., & Bouter, L. (2021). Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. MetaArXiv Preprints, July 6,

Haven, T. L., Tijdink, J. K., Martinson, B. C., & Bouter, L. M. (2019). Perceptions of research integrity climate differ between academic ranks and disciplinary fields: Results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0210599.

Hjellbrekke, J., Ingierd, H. & Kaiser, M. (2019). Diskutabel forskingspraksis: holdninger og handlinger. Bergen: Univ. of Bergen, The National Committees for Research Ethics in Norway &Western Norway University of Applied Sciences.

Kaiser, M., Drivdal, L., Hjellbrekke, J., Ingierd, H. & Rekdal (O.B.) (2022). “Questionable Research Practices and Misconduct Among Norwegian Researchers.” In Science and Engineering Ethics volume 28, Article number: 2 (2022)

Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737–738.

McCutcheon, Allan L.  (1986). Latent Class Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage. QASS. 

Xie, Y., Wang, K., & Kong, Y. (2021). «Prevalence of research misconduct and questionable research practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.” Science and Engineering Ethics.